|
The Irish left opposition:
reformist strategy hits the buffers
In 2011 a conference was held in Dublin
to launch a national campaign against the household charge, a special flat-rate
tax designed to force workers to pay for the bank bailout.
The conference and its agenda was the
outcome of private negotiations between the socialist groups, the anarchists
and the republican group eirigi and was very highly structured. However
in one session a Socialist Democracy member asked about the overall
policy and strategy of the new movement.
The lively discussion that followed was
brought to an end by Socialist party leader Joe Higgins. The tactic of
the new movement, he said, was non-payment. The strategy was non-payment
and the policy - it was non-payment too.
The household charge movement fell apart
in division and sectarian in-fighting. It was replaced by the water charges
movement with the same mantra of non-payment.
However there are no non-political movements.
Politics are either an open and lively part of the life of the campaign,
allowing it to adapt to new situations or they take place behind the scenes,
feeding conspiracy and infighting.
Keeping politics off the table
Keeping politics off the table is a tradition
that stretches back decades in the Irish socialist movement. Politics are
reserved for themselves and the political character of the movement appears
when we find that the local groups are organized on a constituency basis
and help grow the electoral base of the parties. This conspiratorial approach
comes out of years of working class retreat, where the interests
of the groups come to weigh more and more above the interests of the working
class as a whole. The method of the left has been to concentrate on “people
power” and limited civil disobedience. This enables them to avoid proposals
to the organised working class and to maintain their slavish obedience
to the wishes of the union bureaucracy.
Civil disobedience is a tactic and not
by itself a strategy. By default the strategy becomes a struggle
to win representation in the Dail. Again as a consequence the possibilities
of advancing the interests of the working class through the Dail are wildly
exaggerated.
There are some very toxic side effects.
Without political discussion there are
only the most minimal democratic structures. Ad-hoc steering
committees become the norm.
The movements are fragile and collapse
when the campaigns come to an end.
The movements do not develop politically
to take up wider issues of austerity.
The socialist groups don't develop or
move closer. Their sectional interests trumped the need for a unified working
class party.
We have reached the endpoint of this process.
We have ten socialist TDs, six in an alliance. The issue of water charges
has been pushed into the long grass. Positions in the Dail were to act
as a platform for socialist policies and for broader mobilizations, yet
the socialist groups co-operated with left union bosses in shutting down
the Right2Water mobilizations in favour of a movement of electoral lobbying
around the rebranded Right2Change.
Vacuum
Now they inhabit a vacuum. The political
reformism that focuses on action in the Dail has produced
impotence. They can't join the scramble to sell their vote and are constrained
by their insistence on a single-issue protest around
water charges that leaves them without a coherent political movement on
the streets
Even though they have stepped back from
the push by the left unions to sanctify Sinn Fein as a socialist party,
they are finding that in practice inside the Dail and constrained around
water, they are pushed back into the union sponsored alliance. It
is as the Right2Change that they are intervening, but the parliamentary
arithmetic means that they simply provide cover for a Sinn Fein Left opposition.
This means death for the socialist groups, if Sinn Fein are successful
in wearing the mantle of protectors of the working class.
For Sinn Fein the task in the Dail is
to outflank Fianna Fail on the left while remaining “responsible” within
the confines of the Troika budget. They do this by proclaiming the
exceptionalism of water charges. People really need water, so the fiscal
space free to the government should be used to ensure it stays under public
control and is not a commodity. If this line of argument is accepted there
is no possibility of resolving all the other needs of Irish workers – the
privatisation agenda will race ahead.
The consequence is that there is no broad
left around which a parliamentary reformist current can be built. In fact
they have no strategy to build a party beyond one of building their own
organisations. The alliance of the two groups is a purely administrative
measure to gain more Dail resources. There is no joint organisation on
the streets and the pretence of unity collapses at the border, with the
Socialist party’s hostility to an all-Ireland movement and the Socialist
Workers Party’s indifference on the issue leading to separate electoral
fronts.
Intensifying class struggle
Meanwhile the class struggle is intensifying.
A government of speculators and landlords is totally unable to resolve
a housing catastrophe. Any attempt at resolution will involve the seizure
of property and independent action by workers outside the Dail.
Many workers expect the restoration of
pay and conditions with the proclamation of recovery. The employers and
government show a steely determination to crush them while union leaders
wash their hands and say how unfair it all is. The main dispute, with Luas
tram drivers, involves a private company, and the government have already
washed their hands of any responsibility.
The fall in the vote for government parties
and the increased socialist vote in the Dail election was a sign of the
increasing anger and desperation of the workers. The electoral experiment
has failed and a Fine Gael government is back in power.
Break out of the Dail!
Increasingly desperate struggles are breaking
out in the workplaces and communities. These struggles will generate a
new leadership. If the socialist groups are to be part of that movement
they must abandon the path of parliamentary idiocy, especially as it led
them to collaborate in the deliberate demobilisation represented by the
Right2Change manoeuvre.
A starting point must be to recognise
the grip of the Troika on the country and counterpose the alternative of
a Workers Republic and a United Socialist States of Europe. Socialists
should express unremitting hostility to the betrayals of social
partnership and to the colonialism and sectarianism of continuing partition.
The needs of the workers must be asserted as having primacy over the interests
of capital and private property. The wage struggle and the crisis in public
service must be linked to the wholesale privatisation process that is ongoing.
The battle for housing must hang around housing as a right rather than
calls for mercy from the government of speculators.
We need to see an end to sectarian manoeuvring
and sectional interest. A new movement must represent the working class
as a whole. It must be based on a national democratic structures and it
must advance the call for socialist revolution.
All else is confusion, chaos, defeat and
despair. |
|